Constitutional Court (AYM), to include teachers appointed after March 14, 2014 that the arrangements about the nominations’ was an objection to the interview.
\nDayl\u0131kl related to Law No. 6569, 24 and 1739 according to the changes made \u200b\u200bin Article 43 of the law, will be subject to a designated teacher for one year performance evaluation. Current areas of performance evaluation score will be eligible to enter into a written and oral or written exam. M\u00fckalat, be made by the commission under the ministry. Changes will include those appointed after March 14, 2014.
\nCHP deputies M. Akif Hamzah, Engin Altay Thin Muharram with 121 deputies regulation ‘2 of the Constitution, 10th, 36th, and the violation of Article 90’ \u200b\u200bis canceled on the grounds and opened to stop the execution proceedings. In the grounds of the case, “oral \/ interview system is introduced; With regard to this fetching while also does not include any criteria written exam, oral \/ interview is given to the teaching profession in addition to not being objective is unrelated to subjective criteria interview “the statement said.
\nRequest the opinion of the Constitutional Court (AYM), refused for the nullification of the regulations.
\nCase ‘regarding the oral examination was given from examining the merits of the following statements:
\n“Oral examination held in case the rule, a person’s behavior and thoughts on making calls Answering asked to learn about the judgment, a subject understand summarize and express ability, general appearance, behavior and reactions of the relevance and merit of the profession, skills and culture, scientific and by giving points to clarify the technological development is the evaluation. ”
\nHe used two members to vote against
\nSupreme Court has used two members voted against this decision. Kar\u015f\u0131oy using Osman Paks\u00fct, saying it was unconstitutional, “the oral examination Things to greatly lack of objectivity, subjective evaluations and even beliefs, thoughts and ethnicity is understood that held in an open nature of discrimination on the grounds,” he said.
\nContrary to the rule of law
\nIn the case justification ‘of the candidate for interview’ subjective evaluation criteria will be subject to an oral examination on the basis of ‘was emphasized. The appeal took place the following statements:
\n“People teachers nomination assign you and a year running after oral instruction on the criteria set out in the exam also be allowed, but no objectivity exist and people to look at life, political links, ideological attitudes, ethnic and religious backgrounds, gender and the subjective evaluation criteria can be changed even by the trade unions which they are members After working for a year as a teacher candidate subjected to oral examination on the basis of ‘teachers do not bear the characteristics of the profession, such as the release of dealing with a legal process is incompatible with justice and fairness and cancellation of the desired arrangements for the public interest in not in the regulations, that the Constitution, Article 2 of the rule of law is contrary to the terms. “<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Constitutional Court (AYM), to include teachers appointed after March 14, 2014 that the arrangements about the nominations’ was an objection…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":910,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[15,20,16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-565","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-around-school","category-ozel-okullar","category-top-news-slider"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/egtim.optiquall-qa.com\/en_US\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/565","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/egtim.optiquall-qa.com\/en_US\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/egtim.optiquall-qa.com\/en_US\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/egtim.optiquall-qa.com\/en_US\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/egtim.optiquall-qa.com\/en_US\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=565"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/egtim.optiquall-qa.com\/en_US\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/565\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":911,"href":"http:\/\/egtim.optiquall-qa.com\/en_US\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/565\/revisions\/911"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/egtim.optiquall-qa.com\/en_US\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/910"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/egtim.optiquall-qa.com\/en_US\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=565"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/egtim.optiquall-qa.com\/en_US\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=565"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/egtim.optiquall-qa.com\/en_US\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=565"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}